America Has No Sense Of Self.

The meme above is how I feel much of the time when I watch some of the squabbling over the inane in this country today. The latest example is the resurgence of the controversy about players of the NFL kneeling during the anthem. Yes, I get that it is disrespectful. Particularly disrespectful when a team takes a knee for their own anthem then stand reverently out of respect for the host country for their anthem. The anthem of the very country we spent blood, treasure and lives to extricate ourselves from.

But then our President spoke. In giving his feelings voice, he also by virtue of his office gave them an imprimatur and the legitimacy of policy. The problem with this is, when fear is what makes you stand for the anthem, then standing for the anthem means nothing. When standing for the anthem becomes required by law, then the deaths of everyone who died for that flag mean nothing. They did not die for those pieces of threads that combine to form that flag. They did not die for those words that are sung. They died for the ideals behind these two symbols. Ideas which have no physical form to assail.

Both sides seem to have lost sight of those ideas. The freedom to disagree with one’s government and seek redress is a cornerstone of what it means to be American. That one’s government is made up of your fellow citizens is another. How can you persuade these fellow citizens to the justness of your cause when your speech is to them the equivalent of peeing on their legs? How can you bring them around to what you see, when you won’t even bother to understand what they see?

One of the bright points in this came last night when the owner of the Cowboys joined hands with the players and knelt before the anthem. Then both stood respectfully during the anthem. This is how the America that I know and love works: compromise. One side reaching a hand to the other side and the other side taking it. Then discussing it and finding something both can live with and doing it. To me it was the most beautiful thing I have seen on the public stage in recent memory.

Now, let us take that idea and carry it forward. Let our representatives and senators sit down with one another and find compromises to the budget, immigration, health care and the other issues facing our country. Kick dirt over the lines in the sand, and work with one another to find real solutions, real halfway points. Then stand as one behind the new policies.

Let us take the issues of policing forward. Let our officers and their superiors sit down with the communities. Let those communities sit down with the police and their political supervisors. But both sides are going to have to let go of their lines in the sand. Are there ways to reduce the number of black men killed by officers? Absolutely. The police have been actually doing it these last few years. Look at the numbers.

A true partnership between the communities and the police will not stall this progress as some say. It would only accelerate the reduction in deaths. But we have to be realistic. It will never reach zero. Black men will die at the hands of police. White men will die at the hands of police. It’s not something the police want. It’s not something anyone wants. Working together I think they can find solutions that reduce these deaths to a bare minimum without decreasing officer safety.

And it will probably be community specific changes that work. What works in New York City will likely not translate well in Ferguson, Missouri. And vice versa. What are those solutions? I have no idea. But with the obviously bright and passionate minds on both sides of the issue, I have faith my fellow Americans have a solution in them. Work together and build a solution instead of continuing the path of destruction of one another. Because if you destroy the police, our fallen nature will destroy the community. And if you destroy the community, you destroy the reason the police exist.

Change is hard. Change is slow. It won’t come overnight. If you look back to the Civil Rights era, change didn’t happen overnight. It didn’t end with the passage of the Civil Rights Act. No singular event fixed things. It was incremental changes, over time. And the most significant progress came from men and women sitting down and talking their differences out and both sides agreeing to compromise. Both sides walking away from the table with less than what they wanted but more than what they had.

Why is change so hard? Because this truly is a government of the people. If the people don’t accept a change, it will never take root. No matter what the law says. The protests against the President prove this. The Presidents very election proves this. America is by it’s very nature anti-authoritarian. This is why we revolted against the British. This is why the Confederacy was born. Every change that happened and took root and became a part of the fabric of America, did so because it was aligned with the will of the people or at the very least not aligned against their will.

I don’t say this. History teaches us this. America both despises change and is enamored of it. Only those changes that pass through a crucible and prove itself worthy and positive for the country stay. The others stay for a season and then they are gone. America is the first experimental government. We are still experimenting. And the day the experiments end, America will go the way of the Romans, Persians, Aztecs and Mayans. If the day comes that we quit compromising and changing and instead faction off into cliques, tribes and religions, who try to impose their will on the rest of the citizenry. That will be the day that the United States of America dies.

Posted in Archives | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Civil War

Is it not insanity or perhaps irony that in one of the great times of division in our country, we are destroying the monuments to the greatest time of division in our country? We are scrubbing from the surface the cosmetic reminders of that time and blindly labeling one side of that great war as unequivocally evil. Wouldn’t it make more sense instead to delve deeper into that time? Shouldn’t we explore how those divisions exploded into violence which nearly destroyed this country before it was fully settled? Perhaps we should even try to fast forward and explore how the country was put back together and see if there might be lessons there that allow us to avoid another costly and bloody split or help us put this country back together without the cost of a war?

The issues as I see them are similar if not the same. It is the division of fruits of labor and who should reap those fruits. It is the frustrations and despair of a rural agrarian society dealing with the alien to them dictates of a more refined and technological urban society. It is the changing changing technological landscape reshaping the lives of proud and good men and women who choose to live by the sweat of their brow and their hands in the dirt. It is men and women with mental ability and talents bringing into being almost magical technology to better the lives of all, but also displacing those same industrious men and women who have provided the succor that allowed these wonders to come to pass.

Will we really regress to disposition of these fruits of both mental and physical exertions of the boundless talents of our people being decided by the outcome of physical violence? Will we really regress to labeling people as less than with the only difference being the ideas they espouse instead of the color of their skin? Will we really resort to killing one another until one side emerges as the sole undisputed victor or both sides are unalterably destroyed?

A bit over a quarter of a century ago, when I was but a young man from a small town seeking out what life had in store for me, the stories of the Civil War enraptured me. I spent time in libraries and archives the universities I attended and those pointed out to me by others. In dark rooms with the smell of mold and hot incandescent bulbs against microfilm, I immersed myself in stories of men and women who lived over a century before me. Men and women who lived through our Civil War or died in it.

While we, more than a century later, still debate whether it was over states rights or slavery or something else entirely, their letters and recollections make scant mention of either. In times when they were facing death at the hands of their countrymen, soldiers on both sides, wrote not of the destiny of states to determine their own fate. Nor did they write of the evils and horrors of binding one man in slavery to another.

No, They wrote of mundane things like the weather and how it might affect the crops. They wrote of aspirations to own land or get “letters”, a term I learned referred to getting a college degree. They wrote of hopes for their children. They wrote of love to their families and wives and sweethearts. They wrote of hope and heartache. They wrote of new friends they would never had known save the coming of the war. They wrote of future homecomings and celebrations of loved ones milestones.

There was also the official tales of the Confederacy’s governments and their accomplishments. Rivers made navigable. Bridges built to join together communities previously kept apart by geography. Long negotiated treaties made with Native American tribes on behalf of the Confederacy which were honored by the United States government after the war. Treaties that allowed some 17 tribes to survive to live among us instead of being wiped out by white settlers and U.S. soldiers. Levy’s and dams made possibly by soldier laborers that added hundreds of acres of rich farmland to needy communities, some of them freedmen communities.

And the histories of officers of the confederacy and officers of the union and their deeds after the war were as varied as their stories that brought them to war. One Confederate officer came to help found the Democratic party in Arkansas and worked to reform the prison system to be more fair and humane to the freedmen. One Union officer went on to be perhaps the biggest instigator of war crimes against the Native American tribes. And we all should know the tale of Sherman, who burned everything in his path, whether it belonged to white men and women or freedmen and women.

The inescapable conclusions I reached from my random samplings of these tales both true and apocryphal were this: Both evil and good men will likely exist on both sides of any war. War can make good men do bad things and bad men do good things. The differences between good and bad men are far smaller than any of us would care to admit. And the final conclusion was that unless he is dead, a man can come back from even the most evil deeds to do good for his country, family and community.

Do we really want to destroy this knowledge and cease to learn about it? It was hard won and hard fought knowledge about ourselves and who we are. We paid for it with our blood and treasure. If anything I would think this knowledge would be all the more sacred since we paid more for it than we did for the knowledge gleaned from any other war. And there is already some of it being lost every day just to vicissitudes of time.

Perhaps if we are going to purge Confederate statues, we should take the time to learn about the soldiers they represent. If we are going to judge them, should we not get to know them? Or is just the color of the uniform they wore enough to say they are not worth knowing? Is the color of the uniform they wore enough fact to condemn them as less than human? Is that how progress, tolerance and social justice work?

Posted in Archives | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why I rarely Tweet.

No issue worthy of debate can be adequately addressed in 144 characters.

 

Posted in Archives | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bullying and Carlisle School District

Nearly two months ago, a light was extinguished in my home. Due to bullying at this school. Since this time the actions of the schools administration and board have been nothing more than, “Not our fault!” Even after another of his classmates was lost nearly a month later, they continued to do nothing of consequence. Instead, their entire focus has been on shifting blame.

After the second student was lost and before his family could even bury their child, the school administration immediately went on the offensive with an asinine Facebook post about family problems, mental problems, and inadequate support systems. Essentially they blamed the families and the boys for what happened. Even specifically saying in their self-serving post that they held none of the blame.

Finally I read in the Lonoke County Democrat that they approved funds for a “CyberBully Hotline” to allow students to anonymously report bullying in their last meeting. This action essentially says, “We didn’t know. So, not our fault.” Which is total and utter balderdash. They had known for months. They had known since their January meeting when my brother brought this to their attention. They just did NOTHING!

This Hotline is nothing more than a cover for their incompetence. What purpose is served by a technical mechanism to promise anonymity in a school with roughly 300 students? As soon as any action is taken on any report, it will be readily apparent who reported it. And if no action is taken, what purpose would it serve? “Designed to fail” has never been more appropriate a term. Why would the administrators want a bullying program that is designed to fail? Because they know who the bullies are. They look them in the eye every morning in the mirror.

And as I read this article further, I noted that not one, not two but, NINE educators and staff members are fleeing this incompetently run district. I think that speaks much more than a cosmetic software purchase. If the parents of CHS students want real change, they are going to have to push for more. If the board wants real change they are going to have to look deeper than what the fox is telling them about the condition of the hen house.

What kind of change? I can make a few suggestions for the school board:

Hire an independent bullying counselor from outside that reports directly to the board and no administrator. Have regular meetings with this counselor and heed their recommendations for policy and reports on personnel performance.

Revamp disciplinary rules to assure that bullies cannot use “Zero Tolerance” and other asinine policies to make the administration and school accomplices in their bullying.

Remove the requirement that a disciplinary action requires a certain threshold to be appealed to the board. A minor injustice is still an injustice.

Create and maintain a bullying database that correlates bullies and their victims and uses a score card of events to determine if someone is a proven bully, made a one time mistake, or was actually the victim forced into responding in self-defense. Make the proven bullies change their schedule to avoid the victims and not vice-versa.

Once proven bullies reach a certain threshold on the score card remove all extra curricular activities from their schedule and ban them from school property except during regular class schedules for the remainder of the semester.

Once someone is a proven bully, refer ANY physical altercations to law enforcement for possible criminal prosecution.

Mandate that all school staff members follow the mandated reporters law. Failure or even delay in reporting should be grounds for immediate dismissal and a complaint lodged with the state to de-license that staff member.

Yea, a lot of suggestions here. I am sure that some more experienced than me can find flaws or ways to improve my suggestions, that is why they are suggestions. Some of these are not even my ideas but blatantly plagiarized from ideas discussed in social media about the district. Any one of these would be much more significant and relevant changes than I have seen so far out of this school district.

Posted in Archives | Leave a comment